export@ezsteelpipe.com
+86 731 8870 6116
| Testing Method | Key Principle | Best For | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Inspection (VI) | Direct visual examination of surface and fins | Surface flaws (corrosion, dents, loose fins) | Low cost, no special equipment, quick | Misses internal or hidden flaws; fins can obscure view |
| Ultrasonic Testing (UT) | Sound waves detect internal flaws and wall thickness | Internal cracks, voids, corrosion thinning (ferrous/non-ferrous) | Deep penetration, precise flaw sizing | Fins may block probe contact; requires skilled technicians |
| Eddy Current Testing (ECT) | Electromagnetic induction detects surface/near-surface flaws | Non-ferrous materials (copper-nickel, stainless steel); pitting, cracks | Works through fins; fast results | Limited to surface/near-surface flaws; less effective on thick walls |
| Magnetic Particle Testing (MPT) | Magnetic fields reveal surface/near-surface flaws in ferrous materials | Ferrous tubes (carbon steel); cracks, seams, inclusions | Highly visible results; works on rough surfaces | Only for ferrous materials; fins may interfere with magnetic field |
| Liquid Penetrant Testing (LPT) | Penetrant seeps into cracks, revealed by developer | Surface cracks in non-porous materials (stainless steel, copper alloy) | Simple, low-cost, no power needed | Only detects surface flaws; requires clean, dry surface |
Related Products