export@ezsteelpipe.com
+86 731 8870 6116
Every piping system has a point where metal components must be joined, sealed, and held against internal pressure. pipe flanges are the components that make those joints possible, and their pressure–temperature (P–T) rating is the single most important number that determines whether a connection is safe for a given service. A rating that is too low can leak or rupture; a rating that is far above the actual need adds cost, weight, and unnecessary bolting stress. Understanding how P–T ratings are derived, where to find them in the standard, and how to apply them to the material of construction is the foundation of sound piping design.
This guide walks through how steel flanges are rated, what the tables in ASME B16.5 actually tell you, and how the same principles apply to EN 1092-1 PN designations used in European projects. It also explains how the values relate to the pipe, fitting, and gasket packages typically delivered as a complete project bundle.
A P–T rating is the maximum allowable working pressure of a flange at a specific metal temperature. The values are not constant: as temperature rises, the yield and tensile strength of the flange material fall, so the allowable pressure is reduced to keep the calculated stress within safe limits. The relationship is shown in the standard’s rating tables as a series of pressure values for each pressure class across a temperature range, typically from −20 °F (−29 °C) up to 1500 °F (816 °C).
In practice, the rating answers two questions at once:
Both views come from the same table; the user simply moves down the temperature column or across the pressure row to the class they have selected.
For most refineries, chemical plants, and power stations built to American practice, ASME B16.5 “Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings (NPS 1/2 through NPS 24)” is the reference. The current edition defines:
A useful clarification: Class 150 is not 150 psi. The class number is a dimensionless identifier. The actual allowable pressure at any given temperature is read from the table, and it changes with both the material group and the temperature row. The same Class 150 flange in carbon steel and in stainless steel will have different P–T values at 800 °F, for example, because the underlying material strength curves differ.
For larger sizes, ASME B16.47 covers Series A (MSS SP-44) and Series B (API 605) large-diameter flanges from NPS 26 through NPS 60, with its own rating tables. For wellhead and Christmas tree equipment in oil and gas, API 6A is used instead. The selection rule of thumb is: NPS ≤ 24 → B16.5; NPS 26–60 → B16.47; wellhead service → API 6A.
The standard does not publish a unique table for every alloy. Instead, it groups materials with comparable high-temperature strength into numbered groups, and each group shares one common P–T table. The most commonly referenced groups for industrial service are:
Because each group shares one table, the design engineer does not need to recalculate allowable stress for every individual alloy. The trade-off is that a stronger alloy in the same group is not exploited; you pay for the higher grade but use the same rating. This is one reason why moving from a 304 stainless flange to a 316 stainless flange in the same service does not allow an increase in design pressure.
Suppose the line is steam at 400 °F (204 °C), design pressure 285 psig, NPS 6, welded to the pipe. A weld neck flange in ASTM A105 (Group 1.1) is being considered.
If the same line were retuned to operate at 750 °F, the Class 300 A105 rating drops to roughly 320 psig – still above 285 psig, but the margin has tightened considerably. At 800 °F the rating is down to roughly 235 psig, which is below the design pressure; at that point the engineer must either drop to a lower pressure class, switch to a Cr-Mo material such as A182 F11 (Group 4.1), or add a derate.
For projects built to European practice, the parallel system is EN 1092-1, which uses a PN designation (Pression Nominale). PN is the maximum allowable pressure in bar at a reference temperature of 20 °C; as with ASME, the allowable pressure at elevated temperature is reduced and is read from the per-material table in the standard.
Common PN designations for industrial service are PN 6, PN 10, PN 16, PN 25, PN 40, PN 63, PN 100, and PN 160, with higher PN 250 and PN 400 available for special applications. The values are not directly interchangeable with ASME class numbers; a Class 150 ASME flange is similar in capacity to a PN 20 EN flange, but the bolt patterns, facing finishes, and dimensional standards are different. Mixing components from the two systems is not permitted.
The downward slope of every P–T table is not arbitrary – it is the direct reflection of how metals lose strength as they get hotter. Two physical effects are at work:
The ASME B16.5 tables already account for both effects. The engineer’s job is to read the table at the actual design metal temperature, not at the normal operating temperature. For lines that go through a periodic regeneration or sterilisation-in-place cycle, the rating must be checked against the highest temperature seen during the cycle, not the average.
Putting the numbers into a real selection flow looks like this:
Doing the steps in this order avoids the common mistake of choosing a class from the pipe schedule and then discovering that the flange material cannot support the temperature.
The P–T rating on paper assumes a properly manufactured flange that has been forged or cast to the relevant material specification, heat-treated as required, and inspected. In practice, three manufacturing factors directly influence whether the rated value is achieved:
For this reason, sourcing flanges from a mill that holds ISO 9001, API 5L/API 5CT, and PED compliance, and that issues a mill test certificate (MTC) traceable to the heat, is non-negotiable on any service where the rating actually matters. Hydrostatic testing at 1.5× the cold rating and non-destructive testing (UT or RT) on the weld prep are the standard final checks.
A flange is only as strong as the joint around it. Three companion items must be rated to the same level for the connection to deliver the published P–T value:
Even experienced engineers make the same handful of errors. Watch for these on every review:
Before releasing a purchase order for flanges, confirm that the data sheet covers the following items – they are the minimum needed to convert a P–T table value into a working joint on site:
A flange order that omits any of these items almost always generates a clarification request that delays delivery, and a flange that arrives without the right MTC cannot be released for pressure service in most plants.
In real procurement, the flange is rarely bought alone. The same enquiry typically covers the pipe, fittings, gaskets, stud bolts, and sometimes the valves that make up a complete spool. A supplier that can hold inventory in carbon steel, stainless steel, and alloy steel flanges across the full ASME and EN class range, and that can deliver matching pipes, fittings, and fasteners from the same quality system, simplifies the project considerably. Multi-location production with mill test traceability, NDT on every heat, and a documented MTC for each component reduces the risk of a mismatch on site.
For bundled industrial piping packages that pair pipe fittings with steel flanges to the same pressure class and material group, the project documentation reads as one consistent specification rather than three separate ones. That single-spec approach is the easiest way to make sure the published P–T rating of the flange is the rating the joint actually delivers when it is in service.
No. The class number is a label, not a pressure. A Class 150 carbon steel flange is rated at about 285 psig at 100 °F and falls to about 95 psig at 800 °F. The actual allowable pressure is always read from the P–T table for the material group at the design temperature.
In some temperature ranges, yes. Austenitic stainless steels retain their strength better than carbon steel above about 600 °F, so at high temperature the stainless flange can carry more pressure. At low temperature the difference is small.
No. PN and Class use different bolt patterns, different facing standards, and different materials groupings. A PN 40 flange and a Class 300 flange are not interchangeable, even when the cold pressure rating is similar.
B16.5 covers NPS 1/2 through NPS 24. B16.47 covers NPS 26 through NPS 60 in two series – Series A (MSS SP-44) and Series B (API 605). Above NPS 24, B16.47 is the standard to use.
The pressure–temperature rating of the flange body does not change. The facing affects the gasket selection and the bolt load required to seal, but the allowable working pressure of the flange itself is the same.
Related Products